3

A handful of tags have emerged to identify the country to which the question pertains. We've got , , and .

Should we be using abbreviations (UK, USA) or full names (United-States, United-Kingdom) for our country tags? It would be best to standardize on one or the other now, and to set up tag synonyms so that we don't have duplicated tags like in the case of and .

4

I recommend following what Travel does. They use the usual name of the country, with a few synonyms to accommodate common names like and . I recommend this because:

  • Consistency is good.
  • It's a tried-and-tested naming scheme.
  • The tags are perfectly comprehensible when you read them, and it's immediately obvious what the tag for a country is.
  • Abbreviations suck. What's the two-letter abbreviation for Germany? Where's ch?

Given that this site is US-centric due to the partnership with the USPTO, there should probably not be a US tag. There is to discuss cross-country issues such as PCT applications (which may warrant their own tag).

  • Germany=de. ch=Switzerland. – user96 Sep 19 '12 at 20:28
1

WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) has a list of country codes that they use. Most are similar or identical to TLDs and common sense, but it may make sense to consider their codes given that the same codes are used by the patent offices themselves. Side note: WIPO is in charge of settings patent data standards that are used by the EPO and (to a large extent) the US.

-3

Yes. We should use top-level domain country designations as country tags. I suggest that we simply assume a [us] tag as it should go on every entry.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .