I have noticed a flag to an answer of mine beeing declined with the reason

flags should not be used to indicate technical inaccuracies, or an altogether wrong answer

While I certainly understand this as a reason to decline flags and the resoning behind this, this site is different than most other Stack Exchange sites. Here, answers can provide completly wrong advice in legal situations - essentially telling people to infringe patents because nobody cares (another example, same question), intimidate other users with empty threats (the answer my flag was declined on) etc.

I don't know how advice like you can totally touch that high voltage cable without protection is handled on other sites, but I would like to see a mechanism other than commenting and downvoting for this kind of answers. They are, after all, wrong. And it can be proven that they are wrong!

This site wants to be the place to go to for advice on patents. How can we allow advice telling people to do something illegal? Is downvote and hope enough people notice so it gets some downvotes the only solution at the moment? If it were a question, I could provide an alternative answer - but comments are not meant to be lasting and have a maximum number of characters, that's not the way to provide a good reasoning on how the answers is just bad, wrong, intimidating, ...

I feel like there should be a way to flag answers as complete and utter garbage or dangerously wrong or following this advice is illegal or something similar.

| |
  • I agree. Not sure if the functionality exists or we are just supposed to rely on down votes and comments. – Eric Shain May 27 '17 at 1:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .