Timeline for How many question should I split this into?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:54 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://patents.stackexchange.com/ with https://patents.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 26, 2015 at 22:15 | comment | added | Matthew Haugen Mod | @Jasper If you read over that answer and still have questions, definitely feel free to post them. As I mentioned, I'd be tempted to include a link to that question saying that you read it, and to be clear about what part confused you in light of the lawsuit you're referring to. But yeah, it sounds like that would definitely be acceptable as a standalone question. | |
| May 26, 2015 at 16:33 | comment | added | Jasper | Thanks for your insightful answer. Re 4: following such a guide was amongst the research I still had to do. What I meant was more along the lines of "is my conclusion that this patent expired (or didn't expire) correct?". (Which became even more relevant now that my conclusion isn't the same as what I found in relation to the one lawsuit I know of relating this IP.) | |
| May 22, 2015 at 11:29 | history | answered | Matthew HaugenMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |